It's time to talk about Mystery Schools. We'll start by putting B.O.T.A. in the hot seat. On her zaadz group, Iona Miller has managed to corral Lisa Dawn, who says that she serves as a minister of the Builders of the Adytum (B.O.T.A.). I have asked Iona to invite Lisa to join us in SBACE. We will see whether Lisa accepts this invitation.
I myself had an ambivalent relationship with B.O.T.A. for many years. The positive part of the relationship is linked to the fact that there was, at least in the mid-60's, a very real connection through B.O.T.A. to what Francis Yeats called the"Rosicucian Enlightenment" and what I have come to call the "Edenic Mandala." Suffice it to say that I have first-hand reason to believe that the Third Order juice that flowed through Ann Davies, who headed up the B.O.T.A. at that time, was about 10,000 times more powerful than anything that Albert Hoffman ever dreamed of.
Many years later, I managed to acquire the transcriptions of Ann Davies' "Meditational Ascent of the Tree" and some other material. The MAT material is amongst the MOST lucid, incisive and brilliant expositions on Kabbalah/Qabalah that I have ever seen. I'm not sure who REALLY transcribed that package of "lessons"--quite frankly, this looked very much out of Ann's league--but the consciousness behind it was the real deal. The group carried a shadow (all things do) but in its time, it was also connected to something much bigger than itself.
The problem for me was that many of BOTA's members and leaders appeared to be intellectually lazy and complacent. Too often, they spoke in bland cliches or, in a cult of personality worship, they paid mindless obeisance to their leaders, whom they looked to as ultimate authorities. They took the concept of "non-attachment" to a whole new level with their obsessional attachment to tarot, whose crystalized thought-forms would probably persist--to their detriment--for many lifetimes.
For now, however, I'd like to point interested readers to a policy letter from B.O.T.A. dated July 6, 1990 that I have scanned in the photo album of this tribe. See celestialearth.tribe.net/photo...4c585a .
If necessary, click to enlarge the text of this revealing document. It was written by Joseph Nolan, who served as an officer in B.O.T.A.. His job was to protect BOTA. I have since learned that Mr. Nolan was severely rebuked for releasing this letter, not because it was inaccurate but because he openly disclosed policy on such a sensitive subject. B.O.T.A.'s more senior officers believed that this policy should have been kept secret and that Mr. Nolan's decision to reveal it to me was a grave indiscretion. I can't do anything about institutional prejudices but I very much regret any retribution that Mr. Nolan suffered because of his candor. By making this letter public, I hope that I am, to some extent, mitigating negative karma associated with this incident, as it affected both of us.
What troubles me most is not that BOTA's letter espoused patronizing, ignorant and tautological nonsense--we have that in the far right and in the White House--but that its homophobic policies were kept secret from members who had spent years and even decades associating with the Order. This invariably was no small thing. It typically involved deep trust and receptivity at a psychic level. Talk about betrayal. How can people be expected to "break out of the cosmic egg" into a universe of non-separateness if they have to remain in the closet for fear of offending high-ranking homophobes through whom the initiatory current flows? B.O.T.A.'s secret policy of rejecting sexual minorities--rejection of their essential humanity and occult center, i.e., their sexual soul--had to have caused a lot of pain, confusion and consternation. That these emotions were only subliminally apprehended and then suppressed or repressed only adds to the tragedy.
I believe that B.O.T.A. should be called to account for the damage that it has perpetrated in the name of these policies. I do not know if these policies are in effect at this time but I have no reason to think that thay are not. I am hoping that at least some interested members of the "consciousness communitiy" might want to insist that BOTA be more forthright about this issue.
How do we do this? By spreading the word. The letter doesn't depend on any editorial comments. It speaks for itself. My hope is that it gets read. This sort of thing could be facilitated, say, through referencing the url of this post on an Amazon book review. Or, if you are so moved, you may wish to crosspost it on another tribe or send it to acquaintances whom you believe might have an interest in this matter.
For those curious about the chronology of events, I reaffiliated with BOTA in the late 80s in a futile attempt to re-experience the initiatory experience I had for a short time on a 24/7 basis in 1967. I've fretted for years about whether or not to release this letter. In the early 90's, there was not much I could do with it because the Internet hadn't really been discovered. Later, when the Web became more popular, I rationalized many reasons for not doing it. If I am honest, however, I think that one of the reasons why I did not step forward earlier was fear. There was this niggling fear in the back of my mind that if I outed BOTA, there might be some sort of retaliation burden that I'd have to absorb at an occult level. In the end, however, I dismissed the fear, resolving that I'd trust my angel/daimon to hold the peace.
Then again, I felt a curious kind of sympathy for Joseph Nolan and his treatment at the hands of more senior officers in B.O.T.A. His beliefs were ignorant, but he showed integrity in revealing B.O.T.A.'s policy on this issue. For that, I was grateful. It took me awhile before I sorted out my loyalties in this matter.
And there was yet a third issue that had to do with motive. What would be the point of bringing this forward? What higher purpose might be served? The answer, of course, is that occult initiations cannot take place without trust, and misplaced trust is very dangerous. After 16 years,that issue hasn't gone away. It's time to deal with it out in the open.
Now that Lisa has joined Iona's group at pods.zaadz.com/qabalah , it seems like a perfect time to go public with this. I am sincere in inviting a candid dialogue on this subject with Lisa and B.O.T.A. Let's see whether they are up for it.
I myself had an ambivalent relationship with B.O.T.A. for many years. The positive part of the relationship is linked to the fact that there was, at least in the mid-60's, a very real connection through B.O.T.A. to what Francis Yeats called the"Rosicucian Enlightenment" and what I have come to call the "Edenic Mandala." Suffice it to say that I have first-hand reason to believe that the Third Order juice that flowed through Ann Davies, who headed up the B.O.T.A. at that time, was about 10,000 times more powerful than anything that Albert Hoffman ever dreamed of.
Many years later, I managed to acquire the transcriptions of Ann Davies' "Meditational Ascent of the Tree" and some other material. The MAT material is amongst the MOST lucid, incisive and brilliant expositions on Kabbalah/Qabalah that I have ever seen. I'm not sure who REALLY transcribed that package of "lessons"--quite frankly, this looked very much out of Ann's league--but the consciousness behind it was the real deal. The group carried a shadow (all things do) but in its time, it was also connected to something much bigger than itself.
The problem for me was that many of BOTA's members and leaders appeared to be intellectually lazy and complacent. Too often, they spoke in bland cliches or, in a cult of personality worship, they paid mindless obeisance to their leaders, whom they looked to as ultimate authorities. They took the concept of "non-attachment" to a whole new level with their obsessional attachment to tarot, whose crystalized thought-forms would probably persist--to their detriment--for many lifetimes.
For now, however, I'd like to point interested readers to a policy letter from B.O.T.A. dated July 6, 1990 that I have scanned in the photo album of this tribe. See celestialearth.tribe.net/photo...4c585a .
If necessary, click to enlarge the text of this revealing document. It was written by Joseph Nolan, who served as an officer in B.O.T.A.. His job was to protect BOTA. I have since learned that Mr. Nolan was severely rebuked for releasing this letter, not because it was inaccurate but because he openly disclosed policy on such a sensitive subject. B.O.T.A.'s more senior officers believed that this policy should have been kept secret and that Mr. Nolan's decision to reveal it to me was a grave indiscretion. I can't do anything about institutional prejudices but I very much regret any retribution that Mr. Nolan suffered because of his candor. By making this letter public, I hope that I am, to some extent, mitigating negative karma associated with this incident, as it affected both of us.
What troubles me most is not that BOTA's letter espoused patronizing, ignorant and tautological nonsense--we have that in the far right and in the White House--but that its homophobic policies were kept secret from members who had spent years and even decades associating with the Order. This invariably was no small thing. It typically involved deep trust and receptivity at a psychic level. Talk about betrayal. How can people be expected to "break out of the cosmic egg" into a universe of non-separateness if they have to remain in the closet for fear of offending high-ranking homophobes through whom the initiatory current flows? B.O.T.A.'s secret policy of rejecting sexual minorities--rejection of their essential humanity and occult center, i.e., their sexual soul--had to have caused a lot of pain, confusion and consternation. That these emotions were only subliminally apprehended and then suppressed or repressed only adds to the tragedy.
I believe that B.O.T.A. should be called to account for the damage that it has perpetrated in the name of these policies. I do not know if these policies are in effect at this time but I have no reason to think that thay are not. I am hoping that at least some interested members of the "consciousness communitiy" might want to insist that BOTA be more forthright about this issue.
How do we do this? By spreading the word. The letter doesn't depend on any editorial comments. It speaks for itself. My hope is that it gets read. This sort of thing could be facilitated, say, through referencing the url of this post on an Amazon book review. Or, if you are so moved, you may wish to crosspost it on another tribe or send it to acquaintances whom you believe might have an interest in this matter.
For those curious about the chronology of events, I reaffiliated with BOTA in the late 80s in a futile attempt to re-experience the initiatory experience I had for a short time on a 24/7 basis in 1967. I've fretted for years about whether or not to release this letter. In the early 90's, there was not much I could do with it because the Internet hadn't really been discovered. Later, when the Web became more popular, I rationalized many reasons for not doing it. If I am honest, however, I think that one of the reasons why I did not step forward earlier was fear. There was this niggling fear in the back of my mind that if I outed BOTA, there might be some sort of retaliation burden that I'd have to absorb at an occult level. In the end, however, I dismissed the fear, resolving that I'd trust my angel/daimon to hold the peace.
Then again, I felt a curious kind of sympathy for Joseph Nolan and his treatment at the hands of more senior officers in B.O.T.A. His beliefs were ignorant, but he showed integrity in revealing B.O.T.A.'s policy on this issue. For that, I was grateful. It took me awhile before I sorted out my loyalties in this matter.
And there was yet a third issue that had to do with motive. What would be the point of bringing this forward? What higher purpose might be served? The answer, of course, is that occult initiations cannot take place without trust, and misplaced trust is very dangerous. After 16 years,that issue hasn't gone away. It's time to deal with it out in the open.
Now that Lisa has joined Iona's group at pods.zaadz.com/qabalah , it seems like a perfect time to go public with this. I am sincere in inviting a candid dialogue on this subject with Lisa and B.O.T.A. Let's see whether they are up for it.
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
Re: B.O.T.A.'s Pink Triangle of Prejudice
Sat, September 23, 2006 - 12:08 AMI said I was bi and also stated that several persons, including myself, perceived an undercurrent of homophobia at BOTA. His reply essentially said that because of their baggage, homosexuals are not allowed in higher initiations at BOTA. He wasn't interested in MY baggage. He already had an opinion regarding "homosexuals" in general--even though I didn't define myself as "homosexual," just bisexual--and, further, he said that they (sic) were not allowed in initiations in future. lives. If you don;t see a problem in that line of reasoning or in what he's putting forward, then excuse me, but we're living on entirely on different planets. If you don't see a problem with a mystery school's keeping this exclusionary policy secret--which it was--then no amount of discussion with you on this issue is going to bridge the gap. -
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
Re: B.O.T.A.'s Pink Triangle of Prejudice
Sun, September 24, 2006 - 7:52 PMI Googled the topic on "BOTA homophobia" and was surprised to find a thread from an exchange I had with someone in 1997 on www.gatago.com/alt/magick/5142485.html . I had pretty much forgotten about this, since it wasn't web-based. It is relevant to this current discussion, however, and it should be referenced here.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
B.O.T.A. STatus Report
Sun, July 29, 2007 - 4:38 PMOccasionally, I get email asking about whether B.O.T.A. has "done anything" about this thread, which outs its internal policy explicitly affecting homosexuality and presumably affecting all sexual minorities (GLBT).
SUMMING UP:
I will answer that in a moment, but I want to bring readers up to speed. BOTA is the so-called Mystery School in LA that "teaches" tarot and qabalah. BOTA has had a long and remarkable legacy. It is somewhere to the right of the late Jerry Falwell on questions involving gender identity and sexual preference. While BOTA's definition of "perversion" may be wide enough for a Mac truck to plough through, the organization's "collective mind" in such matters has appeared to be anything but open. (See site pics for copy of a letter, which delivers the evidentiary coup de grace.)
Summing up my previous remarks, I have alleged that B.O.T.A. betrayed and seemingly continues to betray all sexual minorities within the ranks of its membership roles. If sexual minority are ever protected at the Federal level, watch out. My main problem, however, was not that B.O.T.A. chose a policy of exclusion or that it unjustly discriminated against a whole class of people, but that it was too cowardly and hypocritical to openly cop to the presence of such a policy. It hoodwinked even its own membership. Ultimately, I explained that it was the hypocrisy of BOTA that caused my soup to sour most.
In previous remarks in this thread, I also disclosed that my involvement in this matter is not academic. In 1967, I took a profound initiation within BOTA that has stayed with me, at a certain level of awareness, even to this day. For this, I shall always be grateful.
STATUS REPORT:
While BOTA has not issued any public Fatwas on my head for posting this stuff all over the Internet (it comes blasting up in a Google search of "homosexuality homophobia"), it cannot be very happy. More pointedly, BOTA has, to my knowledge, failed to directly respond to any allegation in this thread.
I think it is fair to say BOTA’s "edict against queers and sexual minorities" still stands. One imagines that it is still secret, or perhaps (in the face of adverse publicity), they decided to go public with their bigotry.
NOSTALGIC DELIGHTS:
There will those who will shake their heads and ask how anyone could have gotten mixed up in BOTA. In the late 60's, it was much different. There was the same prejudice and garbage, of course, but its chief honcho, Ann Davies, did have a gift. She was, as they say in occult-lore, rather well-connected. In qabalistic language, she was able to "bridge the Abyss." I believe from firsthand experience that BOTA never quite recovered from Ann's death. Oh, there's probably a thin kind of linkage of sorts, but last time I looked in, it did not seem robust.
Suffice it to say that I shall forever be glad that had happened in my case -- for having had that early light show experience.
I am also glad that disconnection occurred when it did.
BEYOND THE GREAT DIVIDE:
Fatwa or nor, one thing is clear. BOTA regards me in the same light as Bush regards Cyndy Sheehan (bless you Cyndy). I probably won’t be welcome to the table in any next life.
To which I happily say: OK. In this respect, I’ve bet the farm. It’s partly about this “talking truth to power” thing. It’s also because I simply don’t believe that in the future, Mystery Schools (with all their attendant demagoguery and outer dogma) will be in any way essential.”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
The Larry Craig of Occultism
Fri, January 18, 2008 - 9:32 PMEmard was already a minister in 1967. I heard him deliver a sermon and absolutely hated it.. and this was in my non-separateness, uber-enlightened werewolf phase.
Personally, I don't give a da*med if Emard liked to parade through Chapter in panties. At issue was his enduring hypocrisy.
That is why I compared him to Senator Larry Craig, from Idaho. So BOTA busted him. That explains, to some extent at least, the tone of Joseph Nolan's letter. It would seem to explain a lot.
I saw Emard as a very uptight, very angry man. It was all internalized, of course, but that would make sense too if he hated himself having certain kinks. As if that matters.
That must have come tumbling out after the time I quit BOTA (again, for the upteenth time) in around 1972. Emard's outing and confusion probably registered in not so good ways with BOTA's Chapter.
My two doggies have a very refined capacity to generalize and discriminate, but Chapter, being a preternaturally dumb animal in denial of its own Shadow, almost assuredly concluded--based on Emard's own example--that gays (and that includes closeted gays) were bad news. Boy, were they angry people.
Hence this silly policy.
The closet-scene could definitely have become a MAJOR problem for any gay man or woman, but they didn't nail IT as the problem, they went after Emard's shame-based sexual orientation.
What followed, of course, is no different from what happened in the life of Senator Craig. Emard went on to endorse an administrative policy that was draconian in nature, a real piece of work when it came to homophobia's and hate's posing as tolerance and love. Larry Craig and Gene Emard loved gays enough to systematically malign and destroy them.
Being so hierarchical, this policy crystallized at the highest levels. It was never fully questioned.
As an epitaph, I might indicate that Gene Emard was destined to become "the toilet senator of occultism."
You are right-on with your closing remarks. In an occult universe, we have the premise of non-separateness. Honesty is necessary, but so is compassion. Energy conveys consciousness, and vice versa. You don't make people feel like sh*t and then feed them crazy agendas about someday becoming enlightened adepts.
BOTA's handling of its own group Shadow led it to project it on those who didn't quite fit the tarot-zombie credo. You were one of those people, as was I, and even Emard. The lesson to be learned here, I think, has to do with the necessity not just of pumping up the Heart Chakra, but of integrating one's Shadow.
I'm not speaking Jungian doctrine here. I think you know what I mean.
May I make an observation? It seems you've been pretty hurt, as I was, as well. Have you had any luck talking it out with anyone? What would a "resolution" look like? -
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
Re: B.O.T.A.'s Pink Triangle of Prejudice
Wed, February 13, 2008 - 9:16 PMPursuant to Sheila's request (below), I deleted a lengthy exchange of posts between her and myself. She had worked at BOTA for some amount of time and had shared a few of her concerns that, while not identical, were similar to mine.
I was not entirely thrilled at removing the posts since a lot of empty space would appear. I also opined that there was no reason to delete anything since I strongly believed in the principle of "informed consent," and my single issue with BOTA is that candid information was not given to its members. I felt "called" to provide that information to newbies to the group, she did not. Moreover, I didn't want it to look like I had arbitrarily deleted her posts because I disagreed with her (we agreed on much more than not), and I asked her to post her request in writing. She has done that and subsequently, I have reluctantly deleted all of her posts except for this single written request.
While I was at it, I decided to do more housecleaning. I deleted some other posts that were somewhat "chatty" and that I thought might be distracting. Many of them were my own, but a few were from other people who reiterated what had already been said previously.
This "leaner look" makes this lengthy thread, I think, a bit easier on the eyes.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
This post was deleted by Miguelino Tatiana
-
-
Re: B.O.T.A.'s Pink Triangle of Prejudice
Sat, May 10, 2008 - 2:56 PMBen,
I think there is way too much silly interpersonal drama in nearly all occult-oriented societies, even the more "well-connected" ones of earlier decades. To be fair, however, I must say that my inferences regarding Gene Emard's role are, after all, only well-informed conjectures based on what others told me, including several staff members of BOTA. I also based on my comments, of course, on how Mr. Emard himself had presented. I tried to connect certain dots, and I believe my conclusions are on-target. That said, rumor is a very dangerous commodity. The letter posted in the uploaded files to this tribe is, of course, undeniably objective. It says what it says with absolute clarity. In its time, it represented the ultimate "outing" BOTA. Here, I am reminded of Condoleeza Rice's mendacious declaration that America does not endorse torture. The letter from Joseph Nolan, in its own weird way, are rather like the photos from Abu Ghraib.
At issue is whether BOTA has a right to intentionally deceive its membership about deeply ingrained discriminatory and prejudicial practices. These practices will quite literally "close the gates" to precisely the kinds of initiations that BOTA holds out as carrots. The closing of the gate is itself occult (i.e., secret). It is this group's legacy of secrecy and hypocrisy that I most forcefully condemn.
My having declined to talk any further about personalities was to keep the focus on this issue. If you are a member of the group and are gay, assuming this policy is still intact, then you must remain in the closet or else. If you are open, you will be excluded from the very kinds of initiatory experiences that Case hints at and that, I would maintain, require a dyadic relationship with an Other. The same policy would apparently apply to bisexuals, such as myself; to transgendered people, also rather like myself; and to Queers in general, who are absolutely like myself. If your Other is BOTA and if you are a sexual minority (aren't we all?), beware.
As you probably know, BOTA fronts an insultingly jejune publication called the "Open Door." Assuming its policy hasn't become more enlightened, this "open door" would closed to you, assuming you weren't totally straight.
You might wonder how this open and closing of a door could happen. Well, the so-called "door" is related to the fifth chakra, or (to use BOTA's terms) the Venus Center. When the Scorpio Force is properly tweaked, the "interior stars" begin to twinkle. These are your seven energy centers.
Sex is not superfluous here. It is fundamental. Obsessions that derive from sex, such as sexual/gender preferences, go hand in glove with the overall territory. If you are in fact a member of BOTA, you may wish to insist that they clarify their reasons for not responding to disclosures in this thread.
As I say, BOTA's lack of response has been deafening. The fact that after nearly two years, it still comes up first in a Google search of "BOTA homophobia" should be incentive enough to clear the air. Assuming, of course, that anything's changed.
-
-
-